Wednesday, September 21, 2011

Growing Up Asian in Australia: Intro + Pigs Questions

Introduction by Alice Pung
1. What were Asian-Australians referred to as when the author was growing up?
- They Asian people were referred to as 'power points'.
2. How does she interpret this title?
- the Asian people were referred to as power points because they came across as dweeby and they has ' electrifying brain power'.
3. What did this title actually refer to? Did the author find this demeaning? Why/why not?
-  She did not find this demeaning. She in some way saw it as  a complement of her intellect.
4. ‘All that untapped potential! All that electrifying brain power!’ What techniques are being employed by the author? How does they highlight he misunderstanding?
-  the author uses repetition and adjectives in this. She misunderstands this because it is really used against her.
5. What did the teen author take away from teen fiction? What did she feel that she needed to do? Why? What does this say is essential to fitting in to a culture?
- She felt like she needed extensive plastic surgery. She decided that she needed to read John Marsden and Robert Cornier instead, beause they spoke more honestly. This says that they were suggesting that people should look and have level of intelligence and personallity to fit in to the culture.
6. Who are the authors that she turns to? Why?
-She turns to John Marsden and Robert Cornier. She thought that they spoke more honestly.
7. In the third paragraph how does the author use repetition. How does it highlight the focus of this book?
- she uses repetition of " the first ....." e.g. the first  love, the first heartbreak, the first epiphany etc. This highlights what the whole book is about but from an Asian perpective.
8. What metaphor does the author use to highlight the writers and the writing style in the third paragraph?
" plucking the most garish fruit from the lowest hanging branches of an exotic cultural tree" She is trying to highlight that all the authors are labeling all Asians as the same. She also says that all Asains are different through her metaphor.
9. Why does the author use a quote in the 4th paragraph? What does it say about her reaction to the stories in the book?
-  She uses a quote of the book to point out how the book would relate if the name of it was changed.
10. On page 2 the author talks about the themes that she loosely choose for the collection. What are they and why is it ironic that they show up in this book?
- She talks about the two books that were about mediating betwen two cultures;  'water buffalo' and ' the courage of soldiers. This is ironic because the authors of those books would of been facing the same problems and written a book aswell.
11. At the bottom of pg 3 on to page 4 the author says that sociologists have described Asians as the ‘model minority’. What is meant by this? What difficulties arise out of this label for young Asian-Australians?
- the ' model minority' described by the sociologist is trying to imply that Asian Australian's work hard, study hard and conform to the expectations and ideals of the dominant culture. This is a problem because it can be a burden to Asian Australians because it suggests that money, education, career and fame define their value of contribution to society. 
12. What are the editor’s hopes for the collection of stories?
she hopes that their true identities can be revealed and that their culture is being understood.
Pigs from Home by Hop Dac
1. How does the author start this story which is in direct contrast to the title of the story? What effect does this have on the reader and their expectations of the story?
- it contrasts because she talks about George Clooneys pigs which has got is opposite to the title. This creates curiosity in the reader.
2. What core Vietnamese value is instilled in the author?
- That he keeps pigs just for the meat.
3. What is humorous about the mother’s ‘flair for natural medicine’ in regards to her personality?
- her flair for natural medicine in regards to her personallity is humorous because she come sfrom a long line of hypochondriacs. 
4. How does the description of the killing of pigeons continue the style utilised in the introduction of the story?
- they killed the pigeons by holding their legs and hitting it on the head with a cast iron stove. This description continues the style utilized at the introduction of the story because it is unique, unusual but normal form his perceptive.
5. What is the author’s opinion of pigs? Give two quotes to support your conclusion.
- The author hates pigs " of all the animals you can keep pigs are by far the worst smelling" and " no pig has ever been a friend of mine"
6. In the paragraph on pgs 53-54, give two examples of alliteration employed by the author.
-" thankless task that was." can't find others
7. On pg 54 what simile is used to describe pigs? How does this simile work for the situation it is used?
- " a pig is like an ocean, never turn your back on it". This works  with the wituation because the pig came across as calm natured until he realised it ' bit the ducks arse off '.
8. What simile does the author use to describe her mother sunning herself? How does this relate to the core focus of the story?
-  " turning her head like a rotisserie chicken" This relates tot he core focus of the story because it describes how there way of life is different to other cultures but different in their own way.
9. What does the author describe as ‘the divide between the old world and the new’? What do you think is meant by this statement?
-  that banging the duck with the pan, defeathering it and making congee out of it was very traditional.
10. What is the author’s reaction to the slaughter of the pig at night? What statement does the author make about the neighbours which displays the way he feels about the whole experience? What is important about including this statement?
- his reaction was that he wondered if the girl he caught the school bus with could hear the commotion. this shows that he was either emabarrased or didn't want others to think of them differently. This statement is important because he was scared whether people would think of them badly because of it.
11. Why don’t the parents have pigs anymore? How does this relate to the description of the burial of the last pig they owned?
- they have killed all the pigs?
12. How would you characterise the description of the mother’s treatment of the pig’s blood? Is it appetising?
The description of the throat cutting  and the blood squirting out on to her arm sounds very grusome. not appetising at all.
13. What is ironic about the way the author has a popular Vietnamese dish? What is it about the way the author describes the experience of having pigs that makes it ironic?
-  Because of how long the description of the making of the Vietnamese dish is, it is ironic because it makes it seem like they are different because it describes how they make it in detail.
14. How does this story relate to the title Pigs from Home?
The food is eaten with pigs blood.
15. Why do you think this story is in the Battlers section of the book?
Because  it describes the effort that put in towards tradition.

Wednesday, September 7, 2011

Shmuel to his family back in Poland (if they were still alive) about his life in the camp and his best friend Bruno.

Dear mother and Father,

Life in Auschwitz is terrible. From the early hour that I awake I am forced to do everything the soldiers tell me to. I don't know what to do and I am to young and weak to cope with this. We are given the bare minimum to eat, just bread and water when I can get my hands on it. Every hour we are assemlbed, every time there are less people. There is nobody to talk to and everyone is fighting. Every day I spend hiding next to the fence avoiding trouble. Every day there are less peopleand the smell of bodies is becoming worse.  I wish and was never here and I could go back to Poland.
One day I was sitting next to the fence and a boy who was exploring came up to me. His name is Bruno. He is my best and only friend I have here. We were both born on the same day. Every week he visits me and gives me food. I hope he keeps visiting me and I hope your two are okay in Poland.

From Shmuel

Sunday, September 4, 2011

Holocaust Art: "It Takes But One" by Elizabeth Denholm and Alyssa Dziurlaj

what visual techniques are employed in this picture
-  the Star of David represents the represents the jewish people. The juxtaposition of colour represent the good and evil. The hand represents hope and an effort to stop what is happening to the Jews in the top half of the painitng. The person leaning down is reaching out to the hand for help. Vectors of the dripping black draws your eyes tot he hand and Star of David.

How do these visual techniques highlight major thematic elements of holocaust art and literature?
- they represent the theme of innocence, good and evil and helplessnessof the Jewish people during the holocaust
 

Holocaust Poetry #3: 'Daniel' by Laura Crist

Daniel
Laura Crist

And the child held her hand
A child tiny for almost eight,
Deep blue eyes that dominated his face,
When he explained new events to her,
that funny doggy,
that pretty rock,
And the freckles on his cheek,
No one saw a sunrise more perfect,
to her,
She so vividly smells the fragrance of
his hair,
his ears,
his breath in the morning
She vividly hears that little heartbeat,
that was hers
always hers,
and the laughter,
that raspy little laugh,
when he caught her in a conundrum.
All this,
But this is merely the surface,
As she watches her little God sheared,
and stripped,
For the gas chamber.

How is juxtaposition used in this poem to highlight an important them of Holocaust literature?

Juxtaposition has been used to describe the perfectness of the child and the connection that the child has to his mother. This is an important theme of the holocaust because it shows the innocence of the children and how their lives were ruined.


How is descriptive language used to enhance the reader's reaction to the poem?


Descriptive language is used to create a connection between the reader and the son through imagery and description of the child innocense and then juxtapose that with a sudden change of mood through description of how that child was being stripped for the gas chamber.

CHAPTER 13 boy in striped pj's

(134) How does the initial paragraph frame Bruno's state of mind?

-  The initial paragraph frames Brunos state of mine by mentioning his realization that he won't be returning to Berlin for the foreseeable future or seeing karl, daniel or martin either. But he was beginning to not be so unhappy at his new home.


(136) What does the question Bruno asks Maria show about his development?
-  The question Bruno asks Maria shows that Bruno is developing thoughtfulness of other people despite what other think or who they are. quote: " .... but when I hurt it, Pavel was the only grown up around and he brought me in here and cleaned it and washed it and put the green ointment on it, which stung but I suppose it made it better and then he bandaged it."


(137) What is important about Maria's reaction to Bruno's question?
She reacts seriously and decides to tell Bruno a secret about who Pavel really was.
(138) Why does Bruno want to tell Shmuel about Pavel? What does this highlight about Bruno's understanding of what is going on?
- He decides to tell Shmuel about pavel because ' he's from his side of the fence'  and he's from Poland. this shows that Bruno still knows little about what is going on because as Shmuel said that the majority of the people on his side of the fence were from Poland and that there were thousands of people  on his side of the fence
(140) What do the boys argue about? Who does Bruno defend? Who is right/wrong? Why?
-  They argue over whether soldier are good or bad. Bruno is defending his father because he wants to be like him when he is older. Bruno is wrong because he doesn't know what his father is really doing as a soldier because he assumes that he is doing the right thing because he is Bruno's dad.
(140) Shmuel says 'You don't know what it's like here.' and Bruno reacts by saying 'You don't have any sisters, do you?' He says this to avoid an answer to Shmuel. What does this show about Bruno's understanding of what is happening?
-Shmuel says ' you don't know what it is like here ' Bruno replies and says ' You don't have any sisters do you?' because Bruno is afraid of knowing the truth about the area and he assumes it is going to be really bad, being the reason why he answer with another question. This shows that Bruno does have some idea of what is going on and Auschwitz.
(141) What connection do the boys have regarding Lt. Kotler?
- They both hate Lt Kotler, Bruno hates him because he thinks he is arrogant and always talk to his sister and Shmuel hates him because he is a soldier.
(142) What has changed in the the way Bruno sees Pavel?
-Bruno feels sympathetic towards him because he recognizes his deterioration and see's him shaking all the time, with no colour left in his face and slightly teary.
(143) What important words are used to describe the way the father eats and addresses Bruno? What makes them important? How do they relate to the scene and the father as a character?
- Bruno says the his family at the dinner table that he hates history because it is boring. Bruno's father gets veyr cross with him because he works for Hitler, insulting German history to him is like insulting Hitler. Bruno's fathers character is reflected by is cross reaction and pointing the knife towards Bruno as he explains himself.

(145) We learn Lt. Kotler's first name - 'Kurt'. What is it about the sounds in his full name that are important? 'Kurt Kotler'
- His name also sounds perfect and rolls off the tounge easily, which also shows what Kotler's personality is like.
(146-7) What do we learn about Kotler's father? What is Bruno's father's reaction/suggestion regarding Kotler's father leaving Germany for Switzerland?
-We learn that Kotler's father left for Germany. Bruno's father is curious as to why he left during Germanies most powerful times. Bruno's father mentions that Kotler's father could of been a coward of disagreed with government policy.
(148) What happens to break the tension at the dinner table? What does Kotler do and what are everyone's reactions? What does Bruno decide regarding disagreeing with anyone anymore after seeing what happens to Kotler? What does this relate to historically in regards to the Nazis?
- Pavel accidentally drops the wine bottle on Kotler. It is not exact but assumed that Kotler shoots Pavel on the spot. Everyone goes quiet, Gretel face goes pale and Bruno couldn't look. Bruno decides that he shouldn't disagree with everyone and that he should keep his mouth shut. Through history, this shows how insane the nazi's were and how strict and prefect they had to be.

Thursday, September 1, 2011

chapter 11+ 12 boy in striped pj's

What are the main themes of the novel so far?
- innocence
- inequality
- friendship
- fear
-  holocaust


What are the main techniques?
- juxtaposition
-allusion
- microsm
- irony
- motif

Think of 5 important questions for each of these two chapters about how important motifs and themes play a role in each chapter.
1.  How is Hitlers power shown in the introduction of chapter eleven ?
2. how is Hitler and his partners behaviour juxtaposed to Bruno's families behaviour?
3. how is Eva's behaviour towards hitler juxtaposed to how everyone else owuld behave?
4.  what is the relation between Eva and hitler?
5. How is the last paragraph of page 125 repetition?